Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs) are transcriptional regulators essential for adipocyte differentiation and function. Previous findings indicate that PPARgamma2 transcription is regulated by members of the C/EBP family. We demonstrate here that C/EBPalpha and C/EBPdelta, but not C/EBPbeta, induce the activity of the PPARgamma2 promoter in transiently transfected 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and bind to two juxtaposed low affinity C/EBP binding sites. Results obtained with chimeras containing interchanged C/EBPalpha-C/EBPbeta N-terminal transactivation domain and C-terminal DNA binding dimerization domain indicate that the N-terminal part of C/EBPbeta prevents it from binding to the PPARgamma2 promoter. Indeed, deletion mutants of C/EBPbeta lacking the N-terminal part of the molecule are able to bind to the PPARgamma2 promoter. We further demonstrate that deletion of a region located between amino acids 184-212, upstream of the DNA binding domain, permits C/EBPbeta binding to the PPARgamma2 promoter, implicating an inhibitory region in C/EBPbeta for modulating DNA binding specificity to the PPARgamma2 promoter. In summary, this study indicates that C/EBPbeta but not C/EBPalpha or C/EBPdelta is unable to bind to C/EBP binding sites in the mouse PPARgamma2 promoter. The lack of binding is due to a region N-terminal of the C/EBPbeta DNA binding domain. Our findings illustrate a mechanism by which C/EBP isoforms differentially modulate the transactivation of the PPARgamma2 promoter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elberg et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: