Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing samples of low-mass T Tauri stars from nearby star forming regions are very deficient in stars older than 2 Myr. We argue that this arises from the dispersal of stars outside well-surveyed regions and is not due to a burst of star formation, erroneous theoretical isochrones, or survey flux limits. Evidence is accumulating, most dramatically from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, that a large population of weak- lined T Tauri (WTT) stars is widely dispersed within and around star forming complexes. The spatial distribution, age distribution, and kinematics of T Tauri stars, both close to and widely distributed around active clouds, are studied using simple models of T Tauri dispersal. Models are compared to observations of the Chamaeleon and Taurus-Auriga cloud complexes. The dispersal of T Tauri stars appears to have two major causes: slow isotropic drifting of stars away from long-lived star forming clouds, and star formation in short-lived rapidly moving cloudlets. The first mechanism is determined by the Δv ≃1 km s⁻¹ thermal velocity dispersion of gas within molecular cloud cores. The second mechanism is determined by the large-scale turbulent motions of molecular cloud complexes. A third mechanism for dispersal, dynamical ejection of high-velocity T Tauri stars, appears to be less important. The results have a number of implications for star formation in the Galaxy: star formation in at least one cloud (Chamaeleon I) has been continuous for ≃20 Myr; star formation efficiencies of clouds may often be 20% or higher; a large fraction of low-mass stars may form in small short-lived cloudlets each producing no more than a few stars; and T Tauri kinematics support molecular evidence for large-scale turbulence in molecular clouds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric D. Feigelson (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: