Key result
Misalignment of diurnal heart rate variation in critically ill patients was associated with an odds ratio for in-hospital death of 4.38 compared to aligned patients, though this finding was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
Measuring circadian alignment in critically ill patients requires resource-intensive sampling, so the authors examined whether continuous telemetry can assess diurnal variation in heart rate as a less cumbersome proxy.
Does misalignment of diurnal variation in heart rate associate with death in critically ill patients?
Observational (n=56)
No
Does misalignment of diurnal variation in heart rate associate with death in critically ill patients?
Continuous telemetric monitoring can feasibly detect diurnal heart rate variation in critically ill patients, revealing a high prevalence of circadian misalignment that may be associated with increased mortality.
Should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for diurnal heart rate misalignment as a mortality marker in critical illness.
Circadian disruption is common in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Understanding and treating circadian disruption in critical illness has significant potential to improve critical illness outcomes through improved cognitive, immune, cardiovascular, and metabolic function. Measurement of circadian alignment (i.e., circadian phase) can be resource-intensive as it requires frequent blood or urine sampling over 24 or more hours. Less cumbersome methods of assessing circadian alignment would advance investigations in this field. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of using continuous telemetry to assess diurnal variation in heart rate (HR) among medical ICU patients as a proxy for circadian alignment. In exploratory analyses, we tested for associations between misalignment of diurnal variation in HR and death during hospital admission. This was a prospective observational cohort study embedded within a prospective medical ICU biorepository. HR data were continuously collected (every 5 s) via telemetry systems for the duration of the medical ICU admission; the first 24 h of this data was analyzed. Patients were extensively characterized via medical record chart abstraction and patient interviews. Of the 56 patients with complete HR data, 48 (86%) had a detectable diurnal variation. Of these patients with diurnal variation, 39 (81%) were characterized as having the nadir of their HR outside of the normal range of 02:00-06:00 ("misalignment"). Interestingly, no deaths occurred in the patients with normally aligned diurnal variation; in contrast, there were seven deaths (out of 39 patients) in patients who had misaligned diurnal variation in HR. In an exploratory analysis, we found that the odds ratio of death for misaligned vs. aligned patients was increased at 4.38; however, this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval 0.20-97.63). We conclude that diurnal variation in HR can be detected via continuous telemetric monitoring of critically ill patients. A majority of these patients with diurnal variation exhibited misalignment in their first 24 h of medical ICU admission. Exploratory analyses suggest possible associations between misalignment and death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knauert et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Critical illness (n=56). Misalignment of diurnal variation in heart rate vs. Aligned diurnal variation in heart rate was evaluated on Death during hospital admission (OR 4.38, 95% CI 0.20-97.63, p=not significant). Misalignment of diurnal heart rate variation in critically ill patients was associated with an odds ratio for in-hospital death of 4.38 compared to aligned patients, though this finding was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: