Why the study?
Heart rate parameters predict mortality, but the influence of circadian changes in heart rate on mortality remains unclear in intensive care units.
Does a higher circadian variation of heart rate (nighttime mean HR > daytime mean HR) increase mortality in critically ill ICU patients?
Does a higher circadian variation of heart rate (nighttime mean HR > daytime mean HR) increase mortality in critically ill ICU patients?
An inverted circadian heart rate rhythm (nighttime mean HR greater than daytime mean HR) is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in critically ill ICU patients without prior cardiovascular disease.
Higher HR circadian variation may flag elevated ICU mortality risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding care.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) related parameters, such as HR variability, HR turbulence, resting HR, and nighttime mean HR have been recognized as independent predictors of mortality. However, the influence of circadian changes in HR on mortality remains unclear in intensive care units (ICU). The study is designed to evaluate the relationship between the circadian variation in HR and mortality risk among critically ill patients. METHODS: The present study included 4,760 patients extracted from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database. The nighttime mean HR/daytime mean HR ratio was adopted as the circadian variation in HR. According to the median value of the circadian variation in HR, participants were divided into two groups: group A (≤ 1) and group B (> 1). The outcomes included ICU, hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortalities. The prognostic value of HR circadian variation was investigated by multivariable logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Patients in group B (n = 2,471) had higher mortality than those in group A (n = 2,289). Multivariable models revealed that the higher circadian variation in HR was associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.393; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.112-1.745; P = 0.004), hospital mortality (OR, 1.393; 95% CI, 1.112-1.745; P = 0.004), 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.260; 95% CI, 1.064-1.491; P = 0.007), and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.207; 95% CI, 1.057-1.378; P = 0.005), especially in patients with higher SOFA scores. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian variation in HR might aid in the early identification of critically ill patients at high risk of associated with ICU, hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: