Key result
ICDs and CRT provide a similar ~39% mortality reduction in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
Why the study?
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus at risk of sudden cardiac death?
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus at risk of sudden cardiac death?
This review highlights that despite competing risks of nonarrhythmic death, diabetic patients with advanced heart disease derive similar survival benefits from ICDs as nondiabetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ICD/CRT consideration in diabetics with advanced heart disease; leaves open dedicated prospective trials.
Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for arrhythmogenesis and is associated with a two-fold increase in all-cause mortality and a four-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality including sudden cardiac death when compared with nondiabetics. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have been shown to effectively reduce arrhythmic death and all-cause mortality in patients with severe myocardial dysfunction. With a high competing risk of nonarrhythmic cardiac and noncardiac death, survival benefit of ICD in patients with diabetes mellitus could be reduced, but the subanalysis of diabetic patients in randomized clinical trials provides reassurance regarding a similar beneficial survival effect of ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy in diabetics, as observed in the overall population with advanced heart disease. In this article, the authors highlight some of the clinical issues related to diabetes, summarize the data on the efficacy of ICD in diabetics when compared with nondiabetics and discuss concerns related to ICD implantation in patients with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahreyar et al. (2015) conducted a review in Diabetes mellitus and risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Conventional medical therapy or nondiabetic ICD recipients was evaluated. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and CRT provide a similar survival benefit in diabetic patients with advanced heart disease compared to nondiabetics (e.g., MADIT-II mortality HR 0.61).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: