Key result
Nurse-led telephone follow-up improves heart failure quality of life by ~10 points over standard care.
Why the study?
Heart failure leads to declines in functional abilities and quality of life, prompting investigation into the effect of a nurse-led follow-up program on quality of life.
Does a nurse-led telephone follow-up program improve quality of life in patients with heart failure post-discharge?
RCT (n=88)
Open-label
Randomly assigned
No
Does a nurse-led telephone follow-up program improve quality of life in patients with heart failure post-discharge?
A structured nurse-led telephone follow-up program significantly improves the quality of life for patients with heart failure after hospital discharge.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports nurse-led telephone follow-up in post-discharge heart failure care; extends RCT evidence for remote interventions improving quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. One of the primary consequences of heart failure is the decline in patients’ functional abilities and quality of life. This study investigated the effect of a nurse-led follow-up program on the quality of life among patients with heart failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized-clinical trial, 88 eligible patients with heart failure were selected using purposive sampling. Patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control one. Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, the New York Heart Association functional classification tool, and a standardized chronic heart failure and quality of life questionnaire. The experimental group received telephone follow-ups 3 to 7 days postdischarge, guided by a checklist from the Iranian Ministry of Health. The follow-up frequency ranged from 3 days to 3 months after discharge. The control group received only standard follow-up care. Data were analyzed using independent sample t -test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and multiple linear regression via SPSS software, V.21. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the mean quality of life scores between the experimental and control groups before the intervention ( P = 0.53). However, after the intervention, a significant difference was observed ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the positive effect of the nurse-led follow-up program on the quality of life for patients with heart failure. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these results and provide stronger evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahimi et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=88). Nurse-led telephone follow-up program vs. Standard follow-up care was evaluated on Mean total quality of life score (CHFQOLQ-20) after intervention (MD 9.91, p=0.010). A nurse-led telephone follow-up program significantly improved the total health-related quality of life score over time in patients with heart failure compared to standard care (p=0.010).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: