Key result
The nurse-led program was associated with a significantly reduced risk of heart failure rehospitalization (OR 0.90) and improved mental health and quality of life compared to standard care.
Why the study?
Nurse-led programs improve short-term mental health and quality of life in chronic heart failure, but their long-term effects remained undetermined.
Does a nurse-led telehealth program improve mental health status, quality of life, and reduce heart failure rehospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=300)
No
Does a nurse-led telehealth program improve mental health status, quality of life, and reduce heart failure rehospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 0.9 (95% CI 0.82–0.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.6% vs 24.1%
p-value: p=0.040
A nurse-led telehealth program improves mental health status and quality of life, and is associated with reduced heart failure rehospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure.
Nurse-led programs may improve short-term MHS and QOL in CHF; leaves open 1-year durability and rehospitalization effects.
The nurse-led program is associated with a short-term improvement of mental health status (MHS) and quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Nonetheless, the long-term effect of this program is undetermined. The aims of the current study were to evaluate the 1-year effects of the nurse-led program on MHS, QOL, and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization among patients with CHF.CHF patients in the control group received standard care, and patients in the treatment group received standard care plus telehealth intervention including inquiring patients' medical condition, providing feedbacks, counseling and providing positive and emotional talk with the patients. At the third, sixth, and twelfth month's follow-up, patients were called by registered nurses to assess the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores. HF rehospitalization was also assessed.A total of 300 patients were included and 46% (n = 138) of the patients were in the treatment group. There were no significant between-group differences in the MHI-5 and KCCQ scores at baseline. In the control group, the MHI-5 score was gradually decreased with follow-up and the score was significantly lower than that in the treatment group since the third month's follow-up (63.5 ± 10.6 vs 73.6 ± 10.3). Compared with the treatment group, KCCQ score was lower in the control group from the third month's follow-up (64.3 ± 10.6 vs 73.5 ± 12.3) until the end of the twelfth months' follow-up (45.3 ± 11.2 vs 60.8 ± 11.1). During 12 months' follow-up, the proportion of patients who experienced HF rehospitalization was lower in the treatment group (19.6% vs 24.1%). After adjusting for covariates, the utilization of the nurse-led program, and increase of MHI-5 and KCCQ scores were associated with reduced risk of HF rehospitalization.The nurse-led program is beneficial for the improvement of MHS and QOL for CHF patients, which might contribute to the reduction of HF rehospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=300). Nurse-led program (telehealth intervention) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Heart failure rehospitalization (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98, p=0.040). The nurse-led program was associated with a significantly reduced risk of heart failure rehospitalization (OR 0.90) and improved mental health and quality of life compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: