Key result
Not receiving a nurse-led telehealth program was significantly associated with reduced mental health status (OR 1.25) and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure after an acute exacerbation.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led program in improving mental health status and quality of life in chronic heart failure patients after an acute exacerbation.
Does a nurse-led telehealth program improve mental health status and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure after an acute exacerbation?
Observational (n=258)
Open-label
None
No
Does a nurse-led telehealth program improve mental health status and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure after an acute exacerbation?
A nurse-led telehealth program improves short-term mental health and quality of life in CHF patients after an acute exacerbation, but these benefits attenuate after the intervention is discontinued.
Supports nurse-led telehealth after HF exacerbation to protect mental health and QoL; extends RCT evidence for remote care in chronic heart failure.
Current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led program in improving mental health status (MHS) and quality of life (QOL) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients after an acute exacerbation. CHF patients were enrolled after informed consent was obtained and were assigned into the control and treatment group. Patients in the control group received standard care. In the treatment group, patients received standard care plus telehealth intervention including inquiring patients medical condition, providing feedbacks, counseling patients, and having positive and emotional talk with patients. At the third and sixth month after discharge, participants were called by registered nurses to assess Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores. Compared to the treatment group, patients in the control group were less likely to have educational attainment ≥ high school degree and have a married status, but were more likely to have diabetes. No significant differences in MHI-5 (68.5 ± 12.7 vs 66.9 ± 10.4) and KCCQ (70.6 ± 12.2 vs 68.7 ± 10.9) scores at baseline between the control and treatment groups were observed. There were significantly differences in MHI-5 (72.7 ± 15.6 vs 65.2 ± 11.4) and KCCQ score (74.2 ± 14.9 vs 66.4 ± 12.1) at 3 months follow-up between control and treatment groups. Nonetheless, at 6 months follow-up, although MHI-5 and KCCQ scores remained higher in the treatment group, there were no statistically significant differences (MHI-5: 65.4 ± 12.8 vs 61.4 ± 10.0; KCCQ: 65.1 ± 12.3 vs 61.9 ± 10.3). After multivariate regression analysis, not receiving nurse-led program were significantly associated with reduced MHI-5 (odds ratio [OR] 1.25% and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.60) and KCCQ (OR: 1.20% and 95% CI:1.11-1.54) scores. Nurse-led program is helpful to improve MHS and QOL in CHF patients after an acute exacerbation. However, these achievements are attenuated quickly after the nurse-led intervention discontinuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=258). Nurse-led telehealth program vs. Standard care was evaluated on Reduced Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) score (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.60, p=0.009). Not receiving a nurse-led telehealth program was significantly associated with reduced mental health status (OR 1.25) and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure after an acute exacerbation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: