Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Criticisms by Goldin (1992) of my report on problem solving (Hembree. 1992) relate to five areas structured as follows: (a) general skepticism regarding research integration by meta-analysis, (b) lack of a theoretical framework, (c) perceived violations of meta-analytic assumptions, (d) perceptions of questionable study conclusions, and (e) possible misuses of findings. This structure seems highly appropriate; I have retained it in my response. Following those specifics, I shall offer general views on the value of Goldin's critique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray Hembree (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: