Key result
Three-vessel CAD linked to ~11.4-fold higher MI risk in patients with diabetes.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause death associated with the extent of angiographically ascertained coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Does the extent of coronary artery disease predict myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=12,594)
Yes
Does the extent of coronary artery disease predict myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus?
The extent of angiographic coronary artery disease is a strong, graded predictor of myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine MI risk stratification by CAD extent in diabetes; extends observational data but leaves management implications open.
Purpose: We examined risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause death associated with the extent of coronary artery disease ascertained by coronary angiography in patients with diabetes mellitus. We hypothesized that risks of myocardial infarction and death were associated with extent of coronary artery disease in diabetes patients. Patients and methods: We conducted a cohort study of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, who underwent coronary angiography from 2004 to 2012. Patients were stratified according to extent of coronary artery disease: 0-, 1-, 2- or 3-vessel disease or diffuse vessel disease. Endpoints were myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, or ischemic stroke. Adjusted incidence and mortality rate ratios (IRRs adj ) were calculated using patients with 0-vessel disease as the reference group. Median follow-up was 3 years for a total of 45,164 person-years. Results: The study included 12,594 diabetes patients. Of these, 3,147 (25.0%) had 0-vessel disease, 1,195 (9.5%) had diffuse vessel disease, 3,001 (23.8%) had 1-vessel disease, 2,220 (17.6%) had 2-vessel disease, and 3,031 (24.1%) had 3-vessel disease. The myocardial infarction rate was 0.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.3–0.5) in patients with 0-vessel disease. Using patients with 0-vessel disease as reference, the risk of myocardial infarction increased according to the number of diseased vessels (diffuse vessel disease: 1.4 per 100 person-years, IRR adj 3.87, 95% CI: 2.41–6.23; 1-vessel disease: 1.9 per 100 person-years, IRR adj 4.99, 95% CI: 3.33–7.46; 2-vessel disease: 2.7 per 100 person-years, IRR adj 7.14, 95% CI: 4.78–10.65; and 3-vessel disease: 4.3 per 100 person-years, IRR adj 11.42, 95% CI: 7.76–16.82; p trend <0.001). Similar associations were observed for all-cause death and MACE. Conclusion: The extent of coronary artery disease is a major risk factor for myocardial infarction and death in patients with diabetes mellitus. Keywords: coronary angiography, epidemiology, Western Denmark Heart Registry, death A Letter to the Editor has been published for this article. A Response to Letter has been published for this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gyldenkerne et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 and Type 2) undergoing coronary angiography (n=12,594). 3-vessel coronary artery disease (extent of obstructive CAD) vs. 0-vessel disease (no obstructive CAD) was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (rate per 100 person-years) (Adjusted IRR 11.42, 95% CI 7.76–16.82, p=<0.001 for trend). Increasing extent of coronary artery disease incrementally raised myocardial infarction risk in diabetes patients, reaching an adjusted IRR of 11.42 for 3-vessel vs 0-vessel disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: