Key result
A multiplex microsphere immunoassay for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in dogs showed 100% relative sensitivity and 97.0% specificity compared to the indirect fluorescent antibody test.
Why the study?
Canine Chagas disease is increasingly diagnosed in dogs in the southern United States, but veterinary testing options are limited, with only IFA offered at a single accredited diagnostic laboratory.
Does a multiplex microsphere immunoassay accurately detect antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs compared to existing serologic methods?
Observational (n=135)
Does a multiplex microsphere immunoassay accurately detect antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs compared to existing serologic methods?
A novel multiplex microsphere immunoassay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in dogs, offering a high-throughput alternative to existing tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support MIA as high-throughput alternative for canine T. cruzi serology; leaves open adoption pending prospective validation.
The vector-borne protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi causes Chagas disease in humans, dogs, and many other mammalian hosts. Canine Chagas disease is increasingly diagnosed in dogs of the southern United States where triatomine insect vectors occur, and there are limited veterinary testing options; only the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test is offered at a single accredited diagnostic laboratory. We evaluated a multiplex microsphere immunoassay (MIA) for the detection of antibodies against T. cruzi in dogs and compared it with existing serologic methods to establish cutoff values and relative sensitivity and specificity. We tested 135 canine sera that had been characterized using the IFA and off-label use of 2 commercial rapid assays with our multiplex MIA against 12 antigens: 9 T. cruzi antigens, a negative control recombinant protein (green fluorescent protein, GFP), a Leishmania antigen, and a canine parvovirus antigen (used as an antibody control given near-ubiquitous parvoviral vaccination). The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio between each T. cruzi antigen and GFP was calculated for every sample. Samples with an antigen:GFP MFI ratio > 4 SDs above the mean of 25 known-negative sera were considered positive to that antigen. Samples testing positive to ≥ 2 antigens were considered positive for T. cruzi antibodies. Compared to the IFA, our multiplex MIA had a relative sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97.0%. Given its precision, high-throughput format, potential for automation, and lack of subjective interpretation, our multiplex MIA should be considered a valid and improved assay for T. cruzi antibodies in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Canine Chagas disease (n=135). Multiplex microsphere immunoassay (MIA) vs. Indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test was evaluated on Relative sensitivity and specificity for T. cruzi antibodies (Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 97.0%). A multiplex microsphere immunoassay for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in dogs showed 100% relative sensitivity and 97.0% specificity compared to the indirect fluorescent antibody test.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: