Diagnostic study reveals low sensitivity and poor accuracy of indirect immunofluorescence in canine serum samples, indicating its inadequacy for Chagas disease screening.
Background Chagas disease (CD) is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas (genus Trypanosoma , family Trypanosomatidae, order Kinetoplastida), that is widespread in Latin America. The main hosts are humans and other domestic mammals, including dogs and cats. Studies have identified the domestic dog as a sentinel animal in the epidemiology of the disease in endemic regions to predict the risk of infection in humans. The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test, which is very sensitive but has low specificity, has been mainly used. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the IIF test compared to a reference array of chimeric antigens as a gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic canine CD. Methods The study included 330 serum samples from dogs living in a non‐endemic Amazonian area in the Brazilian state of Maranhão. These were subjected to anti‐ T. cruzi antibody detection, using IIF and the latent class analysis (LCA) as reference tests, since there was no gold standard. Results LCA classified 284 samples as T. cruzi ‐negative, while 46 samples were predicted to be positive for T. cruzi antibodies. Compared with LCA, IIF showed a sensitivity and specificity of 43.5% and 70.1%, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 66.4%, and a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 1.45 and 0.81, respectively. The analysis also showed an estimated diagnostic odds ratio value of 1.79 and a Cohen's κ coefficient of 0.08 between the results of IIF and LCA. Conclusions The poor performance of IIF, particularly in terms of sensitivity, makes it unsuitable for use in both serologic screening and laboratory diagnosis of CD in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: