Key result
Peak wall rupture index, but not peak wall stress, is significantly higher in ruptured AAAs.
Why the study?
Whether aortic peak wall stress and peak wall rupture index have independent predictive ability for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk over assessing diameter alone was unclear.
Are peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) greater in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to those with asymptomatic intact abdominal aortic aneurysms of similar diameter?
Meta-Analysis (n=309)
Yes
Are peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) greater in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to those with asymptomatic intact abdominal aortic aneurysms of similar diameter?
Peak wall rupture index (PWRI), unlike peak wall stress (PWS), is significantly higher in ruptured than in diameter-matched asymptomatic intact abdominal aortic aneurysms, suggesting it may provide incremental value over maximum aortic diameter in assessing rupture risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PWRI may refine AAA rupture risk assessment beyond diameter; extends biomechanical studies via meta-analytic confirmation in matched cohorts.
Background Prior studies have suggested aortic peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) can estimate the rupture risk of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but whether these measurements have independent predictive ability over assessing AAA diameter alone is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to compare PWS and PWRI in participants with ruptured and asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar diameter. Methods and Results Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify studies assessing PWS and PWRI in ruptured and asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar diameter. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed using inverse variance‐weighted methods. Leave‐one‐out sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. Risk of bias was assessed using a modification of the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale and standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers. Seven case‐control studies involving 309 participants were included. Meta‐analyses suggested that PWRI (standardized mean difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14–0.70; P =0.004) but not PWS (standardized mean difference, 0.13; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0.44; P =0.418) was greater in ruptured than intact AAAs. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the findings were not dependent on the inclusion of any single study. The included studies were assessed to have a medium to high risk of bias. Conclusions Based on limited evidence, this study suggested that PWRI, but not PWS, is greater in ruptured than asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar maximum aortic diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=309). Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (evaluated via finite element analysis from CT scans) vs. Asymptomatic intact abdominal aortic aneurysm of similar diameter was evaluated on Peak wall rupture index (PWRI) (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.14-0.70, p=0.004). Peak wall rupture index, but not peak wall stress, was greater in ruptured than asymptomatic intact AAAs of similar diameter.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: