Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vitronectin (serum spreading factor), a major serum cell adhesion molecule, was compared with S-protein, the inhibitor of the C5-9 membrane attack complex. Data from the literature indicate that S-protein and vitronectin are alpha globulins with the same aminoterminal residues, amino acid compositions, and concentrations in normal plasma (150 to 250 micrograms/mL). Both proteins have been reported to interact with the thrombin-antithrombin complex. The cDNA sequences of vitronectin and S-protein were recently determined and found to be almost identical. In the present studies, rabbit-anti-S-protein and a monoclonal antibody to vitronectin both recognized 65,000- and 75,000-molecular weight (mol wt) polypeptides when plasma or serum proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose paper. The 65,000 and 75,000-mol wt polypeptides bound more avidly from serum than plasma to monoclonal anti-vitronectin or heparin coupled to agarose. The presence or absence of the polypeptides constituted a major difference between the heparin-binding proteins of serum and plasma. When complement-activated serum and unactivated serum were separated by gel filtration, vitronectin coeluted with C9 in high-mol-wt fractions of activated serum but not unactivated serum. Purified S-protein was recognized by the monoclonal antibody to vitronectin and promoted spreading of human skin fibroblasts. Both vitronectin and S-protein were degraded by thrombin. On the basis of immunological and functional, as well as biochemical, properties, therefore, S-protein and vitronectin are the same.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomasini et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: