Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite there being numerous examples of f‐element compounds supported by cyclopentadienyl, arene, cycloheptatrienyl, and cyclooctatetraenyl ligands (C 5–8 ), cyclobutadienyl (C 4 ) complexes remain exceedingly rare. Here, we report that reaction of [Li 2 {C 4 (SiMe 3 ) 4 }(THF) 2 ] ( 1 ) with [U(BH 4 ) 3 (THF) 2 ] ( 2 ) gives the pianostool complex [U{C 4 (SiMe 3 ) 4 }(BH 4 ) 3 ][Li(THF) 4 ] ( 3 ), where use of a borohydride and preformed C 4 ‐unit circumvents difficulties in product isolation and closing a C 4 ‐ring at uranium. Complex 3 is an unprecedented example of an f‐element half‐sandwich cyclobutadienyl complex, and it is only the second example of an actinide‐cyclobutadienyl complex, the other being an inverse‐sandwich. The U−C distances are short (av. 2.513 Å), reflecting the formal 2− charge of the C 4 ‐unit, and the SiMe 3 groups are displaced from the C 4 ‐plane, which we propose maximises U−C 4 orbital overlap. DFT calculations identify two quasi‐degenerate U−C 4 π‐bonds utilising the ψ 2 and ψ 3 molecular orbitals of the C 4 ‐unit, but the potential δ‐bond using the ψ 4 orbital is vacant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boronski et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: