Why the study?
Does modified abciximab and heparin dosing with improved vascular access site management reduce vascular access site bleeding in patients undergoing coronary intervention?
Does modified abciximab and heparin dosing with improved vascular access site management reduce vascular access site bleeding in patients undergoing coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modified abciximab and heparin dosing, along with improved access site management, have essentially eliminated the excess access site bleeding previously associated with abciximab during coronary interventions.
We analyzed vascular access site bleeding from the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials to quantify the decrease in vascular bleeding complications in these three trials, especially those attributable to abciximab. The incidence of combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in nonabciximab (heparin plus placebo) patients progressively decreased from EPIC (8.2%) to EPILOG (2.9%) to EPISTENT (1.7%; P < 0.001). Combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in abciximab (heparin plus abciximab) patients decreased from EPIC (20%) to EPILOG (5.8%) to EPISTENT (2.2%; P < 0.001). There were more major vascular access site bleeds with abciximab compared to placebo in EPIC (odds ration 3.2; P < 0.001) but not in EPILOG or EPISTENT. Modified abciximab and heparin dosing and improved vascular access site management strategies have decreased the risk of vascular access bleeding during coronary intervention and have essentially eliminated the excess access site bleeding associated with abciximab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blankenship et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: