Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Bioethics education often focuses on lectures and discussions to set a foundation for ethical decision making. Our goal was to bridge the gap between classroom learning and bedside competence through computer-assisted instruction. This article assesses the efficacy of MedEthEx Online, a computer-based learning program as part of a required Bioethics course. DESCRIPTION: Of 173 American medical students, 89 in Section 1 attended 8 bioethics lectures and 8 small-group discussions. Eighty-four in Section 2 had a similar course, although two group discussions were replaced with computerized learning. We compared (a) final exam scores, (b) topic-specific question scores, (c) performance with standardized patients, (d) self-assessments, and (e) course evaluations. EVALUATION: Exam scores were comparable, although computerized-learning students scored higher in specific exam areas, felt somewhat more clinically prepared, and rated the course slightly better. Standardized patient interactions differed, although they were comparable overall. CONCLUSION: MedEthEx Online is a viable option for fostering effective communication and problem resolution skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleetwood et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: