Key result
Remote cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved physical (45.5 to 52.5, p<0.001) and mental (47.5 to 51.0, p=0.005) component scores in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Remote cardiac rehabilitation is an emerging alternative to outpatient rehabilitation, but evidence regarding its effect on health-related quality of life is limited.
Does remote cardiac rehabilitation improve health-related quality of life in patients with CVD after discharge?
Observational (n=31)
Yes
Does remote cardiac rehabilitation improve health-related quality of life in patients with CVD after discharge?
Absolute Event Rate: 52.5% vs 45.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Remote cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves both physical and mental components of health-related quality of life in CVD patients, regardless of the degree of exercise tolerance improvement.
May support remote CR for HRQoL gains post-discharge; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background: Remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) is emerging alternative to outpatient rehabilitation. However, evidence related to its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is limited. Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the RecRCR study, a multi-center, nonrandomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of RCR with real-time telemonitoring in patients with CVD, after discharge. The Short-Form Health Survey-8 was employed to evaluate the HRQOL before and 2–3 months after RCR. Based on the improvement of exercise tolerance, the patients were divided into I group (>10% improvement) and NI group (≤10% improvement). Results: Of 57 patients who completed RCR, 31 patients were included for analysis of HRQOL, including 15 (I group) and 16 patients (NI group). The physical (PCS) (45.5 ± 8.0 to 52.5 ± 4.0, p < 0.001) and mental (MCS) component scores (47.5 ± 7.9 to 51.0 ± 5.6, p = 0.005) improved significantly in all populations following RCR. The PCS improved significantly in the I and NI groups, respectively. By contrast, only in the I group, the MCS improved. However, the change in PCS or MCS was not significantly different between the two groups. The increases of MCS significantly associated with days from admission to the beginning of RCR (rs = −0.51, p = 0.007). Conclusions: In multifaced contents of HRQOL, the scores in PCS or MCS changed differently from the change in exercise capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimbo et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (CVD) (n=31). Remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) vs. Baseline (pre-RCR) was evaluated on Physical component score (PCS) on the Short-Form Health Survey-8 (p=<0.001). Remote cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved physical (45.5 to 52.5, p<0.001) and mental (47.5 to 51.0, p=0.005) component scores in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: