Key result
This study is a protocol for a multicenter, nonrandomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease, and thus reports no clinical results.
Why the study?
Maintaining attendance in conventional center-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation during the recovery phase is difficult for some patients.
Does remote cardiac rehabilitation improve peak oxygen uptake in patients in the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases compared to conventional outpatient cardiac rehabilitation?
Does remote cardiac rehabilitation improve peak oxygen uptake in patients in the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases compared to conventional outpatient cardiac rehabilitation?
This protocol outlines a multicenter, nonrandomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation compared to historical controls in patients recovering from cardiovascular diseases.
RCR protocol targets access barriers in recovery-phase CVD; leaves open safety and efficacy pending trial completion.
BACKGROUND: Conventional group-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation through monitoring and center-based approaches for patients in the recovery phase has shown strong evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are some cases in which maintaining attendance of center-based cardiac rehabilitation is difficult. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to ascertain the safety and efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) in the recovery phase in patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Patients satisfying the study criteria will be recruited from multiple institutions (approximately 30) across Japan. In total, 75 patients (approximately 2 or 3 patients from each institution) are proposed to be recruited. Patients enrolled in the RCR group will be lent devices necessary for RCR (including calibrated ergometers and tablets). Patients will perform anaerobic exercise at home using ergometer for 30-40 minutes at least 3 times weekly. During exercise, an instructor will monitor the patient in real time (using interactive video tools and monitoring tools for various vital data). Moreover, educational instructions will be given 3 times weekly using e-learning methods. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is the peak oxygen uptake 2-3 months from the start of exercise or 6-min walk test. The extracted data will be compared between RCR patients and controls without RCR. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of the system of RCR proposed in this study will lead to the development of more extensive applications, which have been insufficient through conventional interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry UMIN-CTR UMIN000042942; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048983. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30725.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itoh et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular diseases (n=75). Remote cardiac rehabilitation vs. Historical control group (outpatient cardiac rehabilitation) was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake or 6-min walk test distance at 2-3 months. This study is a protocol for a multicenter, nonrandomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease, and thus reports no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: