Key result
E-REHAB protocol evaluates 12-week home-based versus center-based cardiac rehab for 6-minute walk distance.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation participation rates are low among patients with heart failure partly due to geographical distance, prompting the development of a home-based telerehabilitation platform.
Does a 12-week remotely supervised home-based cardiac rehabilitation program using the RH-01 platform improve 6-minute walk distance in patients with heart failure compared to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
RCT (n=128)
1:1
Yes
Does a 12-week remotely supervised home-based cardiac rehabilitation program using the RH-01 platform improve 6-minute walk distance in patients with heart failure compared to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
This is a protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the non-inferiority of a 12-week home-based telerehabilitation platform compared to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol for RCT of home-based telerehabilitation in HF; leaves open whether RH-01 is noninferior to center-based programs for 6MWD.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended as a medical treatment to improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with heart failure (HF); however, participation rates in CR are low compared with other evidence-based treatments. One reason for this is the geographical distance between patients' homes and hospitals. To address this issue, we developed an integrated telerehabilitation platform, RH-01, for home-based CR. We hypothesised that using the RH-01 platform for home-based CR would demonstrate non-inferiority compared with traditional centre-based CR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The E-REHAB trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RH-01 for home-based CR compared with traditional centre-based CR for patients with HF. This clinical trial will be conducted under a prospective, randomised, controlled and non-inferiority design with a primary focus on HF patients. Further, to assess the generalisability of the results in HF to other cardiovascular disease (CVD), the study will also include patients with other CVDs. The trial will enrol 108 patients with HF and 20 patients with other CVD. Eligible HF patients will be randomly assigned to either traditional centre-based CR or home-based CR in a 1:1 fashion. Patients with other CVDs will not be randomised, as safety assessment will be the primary focus. The intervention group will receive a 12-week programme conducted two or three times per week consisting of a remotely supervised home-based CR programme using RH-01, while the control group will receive a traditional centre-based CR programme. The primary endpoint of this trial is change in 6 min walk distance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The conduct of the study has been approved by an institutional review board at each participating site, and all patients will provide written informed consent before entry. The report of the study will be disseminated via scientific fora, including peer-reviewed publications and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT:2052200064.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chimura et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases (n=128). Remotely supervised home-based cardiac rehabilitation using the RH-01 platform vs. Traditional centre-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Change in 6 min walk distance. The E-REHAB trial is a protocol designed to evaluate whether a 12-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation program using the RH-01 platform is noninferior to center-based rehabilitation for change in 6-minute walk distance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: