Why the study?
Does a 12-week program of technology-assisted, home-based, remote monitored exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve post-treatment maximal oxygen uptake in adults with coronary heart disease compared to standard supervised cardiac rehabilitation?
Population
162 adults with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease in New Zealand
Comparison
12-week program of technology-assisted… vs 8-12 week program of standard supervised…
Design
Other, 1:1 ratio
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to determine if technology-assisted, home-based cardiac rehabilitation is non-inferior to standard supervised programs in improving maximal oxygen uptake.
Does a 12-week program of technology-assisted, home-based, remote monitored exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve post-treatment maximal oxygen uptake in adults with coronary heart disease compared to standard supervised cardiac rehabilitation?
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to determine if technology-assisted, home-based cardiac rehabilitation is non-inferior to standard supervised programs in improving maximal oxygen uptake.
Maddison et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: