Key result
Tele-CR shows safety and feasibility with 0% monitoring failures during exercise therapy.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation is a class I recommendation for cardiovascular disease, but the penetration rate of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation is low in Japan.
Does tele-cardiac rehabilitation using a remote biological signal monitoring system improve exercise capacity safely in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Comparison
Tele-CR program with a remote biological signal monitoring system
Design
Pilot study
Follow-up
3-month period
Authors
Loading...
May support tele-CR feasibility in low-risk cases; leaves open efficacy in randomized trials.
Observational (n=9)
No
Does tele-cardiac rehabilitation using a remote biological signal monitoring system improve exercise capacity safely in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation using a remote biological signal monitoring system is safe, feasible, and significantly improves exercise capacity in low-risk patients with cardiovascular disease.
Nishitani‐Yokoyama et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=9). Tele-cardiac rehabilitation using remote biological signal monitoring was evaluated on Occurrence of remote biological signal monitoring defects during exercise therapy (safety). Tele-cardiac rehabilitation using a remote biological signal monitoring system was safe and feasible, with 0% of patients experiencing a lack of monitoring during exercise therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: