In this paper the complex relationship between law and information technologies is explored, focusing on the challenges posed by the widespread use of technology and the electronic processing of data. Jurists are confronted with the need to re-examine traditional legal concepts in various domains due to the transformative impact of information technologies. Lawyers and judges must also grapple with the implications of utilizing sophisticated tools, including artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, which require careful consideration of their effects on the evolution of the law. Of particular concern is the potential for algorithms to function as judges, making legal decisions based on autonomous algorithmic systems, albeit under human supervision. This study examines this possibility in light of three key functions: information collection and processing, risk assessment, and decision-making in legally relevant cases. The analysis aims to shed light on the (im)possibility of algorithmic judging while considering the broader implications of these technological advancements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mafalda Miranda Barbosa (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: