This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We compared the characteristics of dodecanethiolate palladium nanoparticles synthesized by two different techniques, a one-phase method and a two-phase method. From transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we determined that the particle sizes were 46 +/- 10 angstroms and 20 +/- 5 angstroms for the one- and two-phase particles, respectively. Electron diffraction confirmed that their structure was face-centered cubic (fcc). The lattice constant a0 was 3.98 +/- 0.01 angstroms and 3.90 +/- 0.01 angstroms for the one- and two-phase particles, respectively. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) showed that the one-phase particles had an ordered core surrounded by a disordered shell structure, while the two-phase particles appeared to be crystalline throughout. The particles were also analyzed with extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). A cuboctahedral fcc model was used to fit the data, which implied particle sizes of less than 10 angstroms for both the one- and two-phase particles. The discrepancy between the two techniques was attributed to the presence of a disordered phase, which we presumed was composed of Pd-S compounds. Compared with the bulk palladium, lattice expansion was observed in both one- and two-phase particles by electron diffraction, HRTEM, and EXAFS. At the air/water interface, a uniform film that produced surface pressure/area isotherms could only be obtained from the two-phase particles. The one-phase particles did not wet the water surface. X-ray reflectivity data indicated that the Langmuir monolayer of the two-phase particles was only 13 angstroms thick. TEM revealed the diameter of the particles in this layer to be 23 angstroms; hence the particles assumed an oblate structure after spreading. EXAFS examination of a stack of 750 Langmuir monolayers indicated far fewer Pd-S compounds, which may have dissolved in the water. The data were consistent with a model of a monolayer of truncated cuboctahedron Pd particles that were 7 angstroms thick and 19 angstroms in diameter.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: