Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The publication frequency characteristics of 1984 Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences reviewers were investigated to provide a perspective on the state of the pharmaceutical literature, its dynamics and some of its features. The average number of per capita total publications in 1984 was 3.56, with 26.9% of the reviewers not publishing at all during the year. The average number of per capita first-authorship publications in our survey was 1.17; the percentage of reviewers not publishing a paper as senior author increased to 50.4%. The so-called elite group of scientists--that is, the top group of scientists who publish 50% of the papers--consisted of 12.8% and 11.7% of the sample for total and senior-authored papers, respectively. Waring distributions were shown to adequately characterize the data. The conceptual scheme leading to the Waring distribution assumes three fundamental characteristics: (1) a "self-reproducing" property, viz., the rate of new entrants (potential publishing scientists) is proportional to community size; (2) a "cumulative advantage" or "success breeds success" property, viz., more highly published scientists; are more likely to publish their next article than are less-published scientists; and (3) a uniform "leakage" property, viz., all scientists, regardless of publication rates, have equal likelihood of dropping out of the publication community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boxenbaum et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: