Why the study?
Does velocity vector imaging (VVI) provide interchangeable measurements of early diastolic mitral annular velocities (E') compared to tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)?
Does velocity vector imaging (VVI) provide interchangeable measurements of early diastolic mitral annular velocities (E') compared to tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)?
Velocity vector imaging yields lower early diastolic mitral annular velocities than tissue Doppler imaging with poor agreement, indicating the two methods cannot be used interchangeably for assessing diastolic function.
VVI E' measurements should not substitute for TDI in diastolic assessment; leaves open need for modality-specific reference values.
BACKGROUND: Early diastolic mitral annular velocities (E') are routinely generated by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), an angle-dependent technique. Velocity vector imaging (VVI) lacks this limitation. Normal VVI E' values and their correlation with TDI E' are unknown. METHODS: E' by VVI and TDI were compared in 100 patients. RESULTS: VVI velocities are lower and correlate moderately with TDI velocities for medial E' (r = 0.405) and mildly for lateral E' (r = 0.278) and are image quality dependent. In patients with diastolic or systolic dysfunction, no correlation was found. E' < 0.06 m/s by VVI for the medial and lateral annulus can detect abnormal diastolic function with sensitivity of 90% and 77%, respectively, and with specificity of 56% and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: E' by VVI is lower than by TDI with a poor agreement between the measurements, which are therefore not interchangeable. Although VVI can be performed offline, this method is dependent on image quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kort et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: