Why the study?
Does the myocardial deformation pattern differ between patients with left ventricular non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does the myocardial deformation pattern differ between patients with left ventricular non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy?
LVNC presents a distinct myocardial deformation pattern with relatively preserved apical strain, supporting the concept that it is a diffuse cardiomyopathy affecting both compacted and non-compacted myocardium.
May aid echocardiographic differentiation of LVNC from DCM; supports diffuse cardiomyopathy model but remains hypothesis-generating.
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is the most frequent initial presentation of patient with LV noncompaction (NC). Our objectives were to evaluate myocardial contraction properties in patients with LVNC and the relationship of non-compacted segments with the degree of global and regional systolic deformation. METHODS: We included 50 LVNC with an echocardiography and speckle imaging calculation of peak longitudinal strain (PLS). Each of the 16 LV myocardial segments was defined as NC (ratio NC/compacted layer > 2), borderline (NC/C 0-2) and compacted (NC/C = 0). Basal, median and apical strain values were calculated as the average of segmental strain values. For comparison a group of 50 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) underwent the same measurements. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for any conventional LV systolic parameters. A characteristic deformation pattern was observed in LVNC with higher strain values in the LV apical segments (- 12.8 ± 5.9 vs - 10.7 ± 5.7) and an apical-basal ratio (1.52 ± 0.73 vs 1.12 ± 0.42; p < 0.001). There was no correlation between LV function and the degree of NC. Among 726 segments, compacta thickness was thinner in NC vs C segments (6.4 ± 1.4 vs 7.7 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.05). There was no difference in WMS but regional strain values were significantly higher in NC compared to C segments (- 13.1 ± 6.1 vs - 10.2 ± 6.3; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to DCM, LVNC presented with relatively preserved apical deformation as compared to basal segments. Lower regional deformation values in compacted segments confirm the concept that LVNC is a phenotypic marker of an underlying diffuse cardiomyopathy involving both C and NC myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huttin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: