Key result
Cathepsin S inhibition attenuates myocardial I/R injury and improves survival in preclinical models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury leads to high mortality and morbidity due to the incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanism and the consequent lack of effective therapy. The present study revealed and validated key candidate genes in relation to inflammation and apoptosis pathways underlying myocardial I/R injury. Cathepsin S was identified as the top hub protein based on the protein-protein interaction analysis, and, thus, its role during myocardial I/R injury was further investigated. Myocardial I/R in mice resulted in significantly increased levels of myocardial injury biomarkers (cardiac troponin I, lactic dehydrogenase, and creatinine kinase-MB) and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β [IL-1β], IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α), elevated apoptosis rate, and upregulated protein expression of cleaved caspase-8, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved poly ADP-ribose polymerase. These abovementioned changes were blocked by two different selective cathepsin S inhibitors, LY3000328 or MIV-247. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival plot showed that cathepsin S inhibition improved 21-day survival rate following myocardial I/R injury. This study demonstrated that the inhibition of cathepsin S alleviated myocardial I/R-induced injury by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis, which may be used in clinical applications of cardioprotection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2020) studied Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Selective cathepsin S inhibitors (LY3000328 or MIV-247) vs. Untreated myocardial I/R control was evaluated on Myocardial injury biomarkers, inflammatory cytokines, apoptosis, and 21-day survival rate. Cathepsin S inhibition (LY3000328 or MIV-247) attenuated myocardial I/R injury, suppressed inflammation and apoptosis, and improved 21-day survival in mice.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: