Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During each sampling period, an accumulating resampler (modulator) in comprehensive 2-D chromatography accumulates all eluite from the first-dimension column and reinjects the whole or a portion of the accumulated material into the second-dimension column. The detrimental effect of the resampling on peak capacity of a 2-D separation comes from the broadening of the peaks along the first-dimension due to the resampling itself and due to the subsequent peak reconstruction. Sampling density (rho(S)) of resampling is the number of sampling periods per standard deviation of a peak at the outlet of the first-dimension column. It is shown that a simple formula describes the peak broadening as a function of rho(S) at any (even practically too low or too high) rho(S), for the peaks of any (not necessarily Gaussian) shape, for a wide class of peak reconstruction techniques, and for any 2-D separation (GC x GC, LC x LC, etc.). In capillary GC x GC, optimal rho(S) (rho(S,Opt)) depends on the type of the peak reconstruction and on the degree of the gas decompression along the second-dimension column. When reconstructing using linear interpolation, rho(S,Opt) = 0.7 at large and rho(S,Opt) = 0.5 at small gas decompression. The choice of exact optimal conditions is not critical. Thus, two-fold departure of actual rho(S) from rho(S,Opt) in either direction (under- or oversampling) causes only 10% drop in the net peak capacity of GC x GC. The quantitative effect of a much greater undersampling is also evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonid M. Blumberg (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: