Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg twice daily in patients with NVAF, focusing on secondary stroke prevention.
Is dabigatran safe and effective for secondary stroke prevention in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior stroke/TIA?
Is dabigatran safe and effective for secondary stroke prevention in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior stroke/TIA?
Dabigatran demonstrates acceptable real-world safety and effectiveness for secondary stroke prevention in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Supports dabigatran for secondary prevention in this population; extends real-world data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The study objective was to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg twice daily (bid) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with a focus on secondary stroke prevention. METHODS: In J-Dabigatran Surveillance, 6772 patients newly initiated on dabigatran to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism were enrolled in Japan (1042 sites, December 2011 to November 2013). This subgroup analysis included patients with (1302) and without (5071) previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Case report forms were reviewed to determine incidence of outcome events. RESULTS: In patients with previous stroke/TIA, the incidence rate for recurrent stroke/TIA was 2.48/100 patient-years (ischemic stroke 2.22, hemorrhagic stroke 0.18, TIA 0.12) and for major bleeding was 1.79/100 patient-years, including intracranial bleeding (0.55). Event rates for recurrent stroke/TIA or major bleeding were 1.2% (for both) for patients who started dabigatran less than 30 days after stroke onset and 0.3% (for both) for patients who started dabigatran more than or equal to 30 days after stroke onset, and were independent of dabigatran dose. For patients with previous stroke/TIA, 17% who received 110 mg bid did not meet dose reduction recommendations (DRRs) and 28% who received 150 mg bid met at least 1 DRR, but the dabigatran dose was not reduced. Use of DRRs did not have a major impact on the incidence rates of recurrent stroke/TIA and major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Findings from this subgroup analysis support the real-world safety and effectiveness of long-term dabigatran in Japan, particularly for patients with NVAF in secondary prevention settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasaka et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: