Granger causality testing demonstrates significant unidirectional information flow from hemodynamic and respiratory signals to ECG signals, highlighting the complexity of cardiovascular regulation.
Suggests directional cardiorespiratory influences on ECG; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical use.
cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of worldwide mortality, each year more and more people die cause the cardiovascular disease comparatively to any other causes, the number of deaths because the cardiovascular disease is estimated at 17.3 million and represent 30% of the total global mortality, among these deaths, 7.3 million were caused by coronary heart disease and 6.2 million by AVC. Over 80% of deaths happen in countries with low and middle income and occur almost equally between men and women. By 2030, almost 23.3 million people will die from cardiovascular disease (mainly heart disease and AVC), according to projections, these diseases should remain the leading causes of death. This study analyzes the interactions that may exist between the three leads ECG, Hemodynamics signals, and the respiratory signals for the 187 patients taken from Montreal General Hospital / MF (Massachusetts General Hospital / Marquette Foundation) databases, using the Granger causality test for all patients. The results show significantly that there is a causality relationship between three leads ECG and other signals. Way of example, the results also indicate the existence of a unidirectional causality from ART, CVP, PAP, RESP, CO2 to ECG1 respectively 97.91%, 81.63%, 93.87%, 93.87%, 93.87% for all patients. The originality of this article is the number of variables selected for the study, unlike the majority of studies that are conducted only with two variables (30), can be defined as being a causal model that can detect the direction and quantify the impact of one or more phenomena on another. According to this very general definition, in this article, we will look at the cardiovascular field. The importance of causality in this case, appears in the spontaneous cardiovascular variability and complexity of cardiovascular regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghouali et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: