Why the study?
Does high-dose bolus tirofiban compared to abciximab, and bivalirudin compared to unfractionated heparin, reduce 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
Does high-dose bolus tirofiban compared to abciximab, and bivalirudin compared to unfractionated heparin, reduce 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
In a prematurely terminated trial, high-dose bolus tirofiban showed encouraging results compared to abciximab during PCI, though definitive conclusions are limited by the small sample size.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable 30-day outcomes with tirofiban versus abciximab and bivalirudin versus heparin in PCI; leaves optimal regimen open pending larger trials.
BACKGROUND: In the absence of high-dose thienopyridines, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in ischemic events with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One head-to-head trial comparing abciximab and tirofiban among PCI patients found tirofiban to be inferior, and laboratory evidence confirmed that the bolus dose of tirofiban tested in that trial to be less effective than abciximab. Whether a higher bolus dose of tirofiban would be as efficacious as abciximab during PCI is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI were randomized equally to abciximab or to tirofiban, given as high-dose bolus (25 μg/kg) plus 12-hr infusion (0.15 μg/kg/min). All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel and were additionally randomized to unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin. Approximately 8,000 patients were to be studied, but after 383 were enrolled, the study sponsor discontinued the trial for financial reasons. The primary endpoint of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab and 6.9% of those randomized to tirofiban. The respective rates of major bleeding were 1.5 and 1.6%. Additionally, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to unfractionated heparin and 7.6% of those randomized to bivalirudin. The respective rates of major bleeding were 2.5% and 0.5%. CONCLUSION: With limited assessment, this direct comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab produced encouraging results and suggests that further study of this tirofiban dose regimen is warranted. The limited assessments comparing heparin and bivalirudin are consistent with prior observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David J. Moliterno (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: