Why the study?
Does 12 months of clopidogrel compared to 6 months of clopidogrel improve net clinical outcomes in ACS patients after DES implantation?
Does 12 months of clopidogrel compared to 6 months of clopidogrel improve net clinical outcomes in ACS patients after DES implantation?
In patients with ACS who are stable 6 months after DES implantation, 6 months of clopidogrel therapy resulted in similar net clinical outcomes compared to 12 months of therapy, though the study was underpowered.
6 months clopidogrel yields similar net outcomes to 12 months in stable post-DES ACS; underpowered RCT leaves optimal duration open.
In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. At 6 months after intervention, patients receiving clopidogrel were randomly assigned to either a further 6-month period of placebo or clopidogrel. The primary composite endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding 9 months after randomization. The ISAR-SAFE trial was terminated early due to low event rates and slow recruitment. 1601/4000 (40.0%) patients presented with ACS and were randomized to 6 (n = 794) or 12 months (n = 807) clopidogrel. The primary endpoint occurred in 14 patients (1.8%) receiving 6 months of clopidogrel and 17 patients (2.2%) receiving 12 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.68, P = 0.60. There were 2 (0.3%) cases of stent thrombosis in each group; HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.14-7.09, P = >0.99. Major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (0.4%) receiving 6 months clopidogrel and 5 (0.6%) receiving 12 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.15-2.49, P = 0.49. There was no significant difference in net clinical outcomes after DES implantation in ACS patients treated with 6 versus 12 months clopidogrel. Ischaemic and bleeding events were low beyond 6-months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lohaus et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: