Why the study?
Does cemented unipolar hemiarthroplasty improve hip outcomes and functional tests compared to cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures?
Does cemented unipolar hemiarthroplasty improve hip outcomes and functional tests compared to cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures?
Early results suggest that the less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture may be justified in the elderly, as it yields similar hip rating outcomes to bipolar prostheses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May justify less expensive unipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly femoral neck fractures; confirms similar primary outcomes versus bipolar in this RCT.
This paper presents the short term results of an ongoing prospective randomized trial comparing a cemented unipolar with a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Forty-seven patients with an average age of 77 years completed 6-month followup. Outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months were assessed by completion of a patient oriented hip outcome instrument and by functional tests of walking speed and endurance. No differences in the postoperative complication rates or lengths of hospitalization were seen between the two groups. Patients treated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty had greater range of hip motion in rotation and abduction and had faster walking speeds. However, no differences in hip rating outcomes were found. These early results suggest that use of the less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture may be justified in the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cornell et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: