Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Synthetic peptides including the gamma-carboxylation recognition site and acidic amino acids were compared as substrates for vitamin K-dependent gamma-carboxylation by bovine liver carboxylase. The 28-residue proPT28 (proprothrombin -18 to +10) and proFIX28 (pro-Factor IX -18 to +10) were carboxylated with a Km of 3 microM. The Vmax of proPT28 was 2-3 times greater than that of proFIX28. An analog of proFIX28 that contained the prothrombin propeptide had a Vmax 2-3-fold greater than an analog of proPT28 that contained the Factor IX propeptide. proFIX28/RS-1, based upon Factor IX Cambridge, proFIX28/RQ-4, based upon Factor IX Oxford 3, and proFIX28 had equivalent Km and Vmax values. Analogs of proPT28 containing Ala6-Glu7 or Glu6-Ala7 were carboxylated at equivalent rates. A peptide containing Asp6-Asp7 was carboxylated at a rate of about 1% of that of Glu carboxylation. Carboxylation of peptides containing Asp6-Glu7 and Glu6-Asp7 yielded results identical with peptides containing Ala6-Glu7 and Glu6-Ala7. Carboxymethylcysteine was not carboxylated when substituted for Glu6 in a peptide containing Asp7. These results indicate that the prothrombin propeptide is more efficient in the carboxylation process than is the Factor IX propeptide, but that both propeptides direct carboxylation; the gamma-carboxylation recognition site does not include residues -4 and -1; aspartic acid and carboxymethylcysteine are poor substrates for the carboxylase, but aspartic acid does not inhibit the carboxylation of adjacent glutamic acids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hubbard et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: