Why the study?
Does medical thoracoscopy safely and effectively diagnose the etiology of malignant pleural effusion in patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusions?
Does medical thoracoscopy safely and effectively diagnose the etiology of malignant pleural effusion in patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusions?
Medical thoracoscopy is a safe and valuable diagnostic tool for identifying the etiology of malignant pleural effusions, most commonly metastatic lung cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports medical thoracoscopy as a safe diagnostic tool for unexplained exudative effusions; extends observational evidence.
BACKGROUND: Medical thoracoscopy has been shown to be an efficacious procedure in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusions with excellent safety. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic significance of thoracoscopy in the management of patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: Consecutive patients with malignant pleural effusion were retrospectively reviewed, and their demographic, radiographic, thoracoscopic and histological data were collected. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and June 2014, 342 of 833 patients undergoing thoracoscopy were finally confirmed to suffer from MPE. The top three frequent causes of MPE were metastatic carcinoma (79.5%), malignant mesothelioma (10.2%), and lymphoma (2.9%). Among metastatic malignancies, the most common cancer was lung cancer (85.2%), followed by breast cancer (4.4%), ovarian cancer (2.2%), pancreatic cancer (1.8%), etc. No serious adverse events associated with thoracoscopy were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Medical thoracoscopy is a valuable and safe tool in diagnosing malignant pleural effusion with minimal complication rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: