Why the study?
Routine biomarkers for early detection of CAD and AVS are needed to anticipate diagnosis noninvasively.
Can urine proteomics identify biomarkers to differentiate patients with coronary artery disease and/or aortic valve stenosis from healthy controls?
Can urine proteomics identify biomarkers to differentiate patients with coronary artery disease and/or aortic valve stenosis from healthy controls?
Urinary levels of TIMP1, MMP2, and vWF are significantly elevated in patients with CAD and/or AVS and may serve as noninvasive biomarkers for these conditions.
Urinary TIMP1/MMP2/vWF elevations support noninvasive biomarker research in CAD/AVS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and the frequently coexisting aortic valve stenosis (AVS) are heart diseases accounting for most cardiac surgeries. These share many risk factors, such as age, diabetes, hypertension, or obesity, and similar pathogenesis, including endothelial disruption, lipid and immune cell infiltration, inflammation, fibrosis, and calcification. Unsuspected CAD and AVS are sometimes detected opportunistically through echocardiography, coronary angiography, and magnetic resonance. Routine biomarkers for early detection of either of these atherosclerotic-rooted conditions would be important to anticipate the diagnosis. With a noninvasive collection, urine is appealing for biomarker assessment. We conducted a shotgun proteomics exploratory analysis of urine from 12 CAD and/or AVS patients and 11 controls to identify putative candidates to differentiate these diseases from healthy subjects. Among the top 20 most dysregulated proteins, TIMP1, MMP2 and vWF stood out, being at least 2.5× increased in patients with CAD/AVS and holding a central position in a network of protein-protein interactions. Moreover, their assessment in an independent cohort (19 CAD/AVS and 10 controls) evidenced strong correlations between urinary TIMP1 and vWF levels and a common cardiovascular risk factor - HDL (r = 0.59, p < 0.05, and r = 0.64, p < 0.01, respectively).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perpétuo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: