Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We collected data from a predominately Anglo American student sample in the Southeastern United States and a predominately Hispanic student sample in the Southwestern United States. Along with an assessment of internal consistency reliability, we examined measurement invariance of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20) using confirmatory factor analysis. We also assessed the predictive invariance of the TAS-20. Results indicate that 2 of the 3 TAS-20 subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability across samples. Items from the TAS-20 subscales demonstrated measurement invariance of the latent means. The relationship between 2 measures of emotional dysfunction and the TAS-20 also demonstrated slope and intercept invariance, indicating equivalent validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Culhane et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: