Why the study?
Does computed tomography accurately diagnose thoracic aortic dissection compared to aortographic, surgical, or postmortem findings?
Does computed tomography accurately diagnose thoracic aortic dissection compared to aortographic, surgical, or postmortem findings?
Computed tomography with contrast is a reliable, noninvasive method for the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection.
May support CT for thoracic aortic dissection diagnosis; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Computed tomography (CT) findings in 11 cases of aortic dissection were correlated with aortographic, surgical, or postmortem findings. In another two patients, the CT findings were considered diagnostic of aortic dissection but no further workup was performed. All the CT examinations were made before and after bolus injection of contrast. Many of the familiar angiographic signs were appreciated on CT, such as a thickened aortic wall, septum between two opacifying lumens, differential time density between the two lumens, and compression of the true lumen. No false-positive or false-negative studies were encountered. This experience suggests that CT is a reliable, noninvasive method for the diagnosis of aortic dissection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heiberg et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: