Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The emerging field of $s{{0}{0ex}}t{{0}{0ex}}r{{0}{0ex}}a{{0}{0ex}}i{{0}{0ex}}n{{0}{0ex}}t{{0}{0ex}}r{{0}{0ex}}o{{0}{0ex}}n{{0}{0ex}}i{{0}{0ex}}c{{0}{0ex}}s$ may be able to sustain Moore's Law by replacing transistors with switches in which electrically generated strain flips the state of a nanomagnet---an extremely energy-efficient platform for Boolean logic and memory. Can it really work, though? Considering realistic nanomagnets with localized or extended structural defects, the authors find that those flaws increase the switching-error probability by orders of magnitude, making logic applications inconceivable. Even memory applications, more forgiving of errors, are dubious. This calls into question the viability of straintronics for Boolean computing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winters et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: