Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Co-layer-thickness ( t ) dependences of magnetic anisotropy energies ( K eff ) in epitaxial (111)Au/Co and (111)Au/Co/Ag superlattices are interpreted phenomenologically. Saturation of K eff t at small t in a t - K eff t plot is attributed to two nonidentical interfaces of each Co layer and the gradient of Co-layer in-plane strain in the thickness direction. The strains are estimated from the results of in situ reflection high-energy electron diffractometry, which were reported earlier, taking electron penetration to the near-surface regions into account. The magnetoelastic interface anisotropy contributing to the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy is suggested to arise from a larger magnetoelastic constant than that in bulk Co, which is in agreement with recent theoretical calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toshiki Kingetsu (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: