Why the study?
NLRP3-inflammasome-mediated signaling is thought to contribute significantly to myocardial damage after myocardial infarction, prompting investigation into whether the inhibitor IZD334 reduces cardiac damage in a pig model.
Does IZD334 reduce cardiac damage in a pig model of myocardial infarction?
Does IZD334 reduce cardiac damage in a pig model of myocardial infarction?
NLRP3-inflammasome inhibition with IZD334 did not reduce infarct size or improve cardiac function in a pig model of myocardial infarction, despite demonstrating in vitro efficacy.
No benefit in porcine MI model cautions against clinical translation; leaves open efficacy of NLRP3 inhibition in other models or species.
NLRP3-inflammasome-mediated signaling is thought to significantly contribute to the extent of myocardial damage after myocardial infarction (MI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor IZD334 on cardiac damage in a pig model of myocardial infarction. Prior to in vivo testing, in vitro, porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood were treated with increasing dosages of IZD334, a novel NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor, and were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). After determination of the pharmacological profile in healthy pigs, thirty female Landrace pigs were subjected to 75 min of transluminal balloon occlusion of the LAD coronary artery and treated with placebo or IZD334 (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg once daily) in a blinded randomized fashion. In vitro, NLRP3-inflammasome stimulation showed the pronounced release of interleukin (IL)-1β that was attenuated by IZD334 (p < 0.001). In vivo, no differences were observed between groups in serological markers of inflammation nor myocardial IL-1β expression. After 7 days, the ejection fraction did not differ between groups, as assessed with MRI (placebo: 45.1 ± 8.7%, 1 mg/kg: 49.9 ± 6.1%, 3 mg/kg: 42.7 ± 3.8%, 10 mg/kg: 44.9 ± 6.4%, p = 0.26). Infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk was not reduced (placebo: 73.1 ± 3.0%, 1 mg/kg: 75.5 ± 7.3%, 3 mg/kg: 80.3 ± 3.9%, 10 mg/kg: 78.2 ± 8.0%, p = 0.21). In this pig MI model, we did not observe attenuation of the inflammatory response after NLRP3-inflammasome inhibition in vivo. Consecutively, no difference was observed in IS and cardiac function, while in vitro inhibition successfully reduced IL-1β release from stimulated porcine blood cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvis et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: