Why the study?
Contact force quality is critical for safe and effective lesion formation during AF ablation, prompting evaluation of the contact stability and safety of a novel MRI-actuated robotic cardiac ablation catheter subject to heart surface motion.
A novel receding horizon contact force control scheme for MRI-actuated robotic catheters successfully maintains stable and safe tissue contact during simulated regular and arrhythmic heart motions.
RHCAF achieved superior stability in animal models; hypothesis-generating and requires human trials before clinical consideration.
Contact force quality is one of the most critical factors for safe and effective lesion formation during catheter based atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. In this paper, the contact stability and contact safety of a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-actuated robotic cardiac ablation catheter subject to surface motion disturbances are studied. First, a quasi-static contact force optimization algorithm, which calculates the actuation needed to achieve a desired contact force at an instantaneous tissue surface configuration is introduced. This algorithm is then generalized using a least-squares formulation to optimize the contact stability and safety over a prediction horizon for a given estimated heart motion trajectory. Four contact force control schemes are proposed based on these algorithms. The first proposed force control scheme employs instantaneous heart position feedback. The second control scheme applies a constant actuation level using a quasi-periodic heart motion prediction. The third and the last contact force control schemes employ a generalized adaptive filter-based heart motion prediction, where the former uses the predicted instantaneous position feedback, and the latter is a receding horizon controller. The performance of the proposed control schemes is compared and evaluated in a simulation environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: