Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objective: Proteotoxic stress induced by inhibitors of the ubiquitin–proteasome system has been successful in multiple myeloma but not in solid cancers such as prostate cancer. Our objective is to find a combination with proteasome inhibitors that increases apoptotic cell death in all types of prostate cancer without harming non-cancer cells. Methods: The effectiveness of rencofilstat, a pan-cyclophilin inhibitor, combined with the ixazomib proteasome inhibitor, was investigated in multiple prostate cancer and non-cancer cells. Inducible knockdown of stress response XBP1s and cyclophilins A/B and inducible expression of XBP1s and cyclophilin B were developed in prostate cancer to determine functional roles. Results: Rencofilstat + ixazomib increased apoptotic cell death in prostate cancer but not in non-cancer cells. We investigated the effects on XBP1s and PERK, important unfolded protein response factors required for cells to survive proteotoxic stress. The results revealed that XBP1s had a pro-survival role early, but maintenance at later times of rencofilstat + ixazomib treatment resulted in cell death. In addition, decreased PERK and phospho-eIF2α likely maintained protein synthesis to further enhance proteotoxic stress. In contrast, rencofilstat + ixazomib did not alter XBP1s or PERK in non-cancer cells. Additional genetic experiments showed that the RCF targets cyclophilins A, B, and D had protective effects. Rencofilstat increased extracellular secretion of cyclophilin B, but rencofilstat + ixazomib reduced glycosylation and, likely, the biological function of CD147 (CypB receptor) and decreased downstream ERK signaling. Conclusions: Rencofilstat + ixazomib may be a new strategy for increasing proteotoxic stress and apoptotic cell death in advanced prostate cancer cells with less toxic side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perez‐Stable et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: