Why the study?
Does echocardiographic strain imaging differentiate right ventricular involvement in cardiac ATTR amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does echocardiographic strain imaging differentiate right ventricular involvement in cardiac ATTR amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Echocardiographic RV strain imaging reveals an apical sparing pattern in cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, similar to the LV, which helps differentiate it from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
RV apical sparing on strain may differentiate ATTR amyloidosis from HCM; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The extent of right ventricular (RV) involvement in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish the degree of RV involvement in ATTR amyloidosis, and compare findings with RV involvement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Forty-two patients with ATTR amyloidosis and echocardiographic evidence of cardiac amyloidosis (cardiac ATTR), 19 ATTR patients with normal left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (non-cardiac ATTR), 25 patients with diagnosed HCM and 30 healthy controls were included in this study. Echocardiographic measurements for conventional parameters, as well as RV global and segmental strain, were recorded. RESULTS: When comparing RV structure and function between cardiac ATTR amyloidosis and HCM patients, only segmental strain differed between the two groups. In cardiac ATTR amyloidosis, we found an RV apex-to-base strain gradient with highest deformation in the apex. This pattern was reversed in patients with HCM. CONCLUSIONS: RV involvement is common in cardiac ATTR patients. The present study also detected an RV apical sparing pattern in patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy, similar to what has previously been described for the left ventricle in these patients. This pattern was not seen in HCM patients. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical importance of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arvidsson et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: