Why the study?
Does visual assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain improve diagnostic accuracy compared to quantitative assessment in patients with presumptive cardiac amyloidosis and mean LVWT ≤14 mm?
Does visual assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain improve diagnostic accuracy compared to quantitative assessment in patients with presumptive cardiac amyloidosis and mean LVWT ≤14 mm?
Visual assessment of the relative apical sparing pattern on echocardiography provides superior incremental diagnostic value over quantitative strain indices for detecting early or less advanced cardiac amyloidosis.
Visual RapSP-LS may enhance diagnostic models in suspected early cardiac amyloidosis; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain (RapSP-LS) was suggested in advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA). It is unclear whether it is present in less advanced CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with presumptive diagnosis of CA and mean left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) ≤14 mm were recruited. Apart from RapSP-LS visually identified, relative apical longitudinal strain index (RapLSI) was defined as [average apical LS/(average basal LS+average mid-ventricle LS)]. Among 119 patients included, 47 were finally diagnosed with CA. RapLSI was higher in the CA group compared to other causes of increased mean LVWT (P<0.001), but with a significant range of overlap noted. In contrast, RapSP-LS visually assessed was noted in most CA patients (31/47, 66.0%) except in those with preserved LV ejection fraction, normal LVWT, and mildly decreased global LS, suggesting least advanced CA. On multivariate analysis of the added diagnostic role of RapSP-LS or RapLSI on top of clinical, electrocardiographic, and conventional echocardiographic parameters, addition of RapLSI produced only borderline increase in area under the curve of the multivariate model (P=0.05), whereas addition of RapSP-LS significantly increased it (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual identification of RapSP-LS is useful in terms of added diagnostic value compared with quantitative calculation of RapLSI. Its clinical application, however, should be used with caution in patients with less advanced CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: