Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The conversion of a peptide substrate to a potent inhibitor by chemical modification is a promising approach in the development of inhibitors for protein tyrosine kinases. N-acylation of the synthetic peptide substrate NH2-Glu-Phe-Leu-Tyr-Gly-Val-Phe-Asp-CONH2 (EFLYGVFD) resulted in synergistic inhibition of Src protein kinase activity that was greater than the inhibition by either free peptide and/or free acyl group. Synergistic inhibition was dependent upon the peptide sequence and the length of the acyl chain. The minimum length of the fatty acyl chain to synergistically inhibit Src was a lauryl (C11H23CO) group. N-myristoylated EFLYGVFD (myr-EFLYGVFD) inhibited the phosphorylation of poly E4Y by Src with an apparent Ki of 3 microm, whereas EFLYGVFD and myristic acid inhibited with Ki values of 260 and 35 microm, respectively. The nonacylated EFLYGVFD was a substrate for Src with Km and Vmax values of 100 microm and 400 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. However, upon myristoylation, the peptide was no longer a substrate for Src. Both the acylated and non-acylated peptides were competitive inhibitors against the substrate poly E4Y. The non-acylated free peptide showed mixed inhibition against ATP while the myristoylated peptide was competitive against ATP. Myristic acid was uncompetitive against poly E4Y and competitive against ATP. Further analysis indicated that the myristoylated peptide acted as a reversible slow-binding inhibitor with two binding sites on Src. The myristoylated 8-mer peptide was reduced in size to a myristoylated 3-mer without losing the affinity or characteristics of a bisubstrate-type inhibitor. The conversion of a classical reversible inhibitor to a reversible slow-binding multisubstrate analogue has improved the potency of inhibition by the peptide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramdas et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: