Why the study?
Does rapid right atrial pacing help diagnose and terminate wide QRS tachycardia in patients with ventricular tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant intraventricular conduction?
Does rapid right atrial pacing help diagnose and terminate wide QRS tachycardia in patients with ventricular tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant intraventricular conduction?
Rapid right atrial pacing is a simple and useful diagnostic test to differentiate ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction, and it may also serve as a therapeutic maneuver to terminate ventricular tachycardia.
May support atrial pacing to differentiate VT from SVT with aberrancy in select cases; leaves open its diagnostic role pending prospective validation.
The diagnostic and potential therapeutic value of rapid right atrial pacing in ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant intraventricular conduction, was examined. The effect of right atrial pacing at incremental rates beginning 10 bpm above the rate of the tachycardia was studied in five patients with ventricular tachycardia, and in four patients with supraventricular tachycardia with rate-related bundle branch block aberration, the mechanism of tachycardia having been demonstrated at electrophysiology study. Atrial pacing resulted in persistent (four) or occasional (one) normalisation of the QRS complexes to that seen in sinus rhythm in those five patients with ventricular tachycardia. The intraventricular conduction pattern persisted with atrial pacing in those patients with supraventricular tachycardia and aberrant intraventricular conduction. This confirms that atrial pacing is a useful and simple diagnostic test in wide QRS tachycardia, which does not require sophisticated electrophysiological facilities. In three of the patients with ventricular tachycardia, atrial pacing terminated the arrhythmia, suggesting potential therapeutic use of rapid atrial pacing in such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tonkin et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: