Environmental surveillance of sewage in Ibadan, Nigeria, successfully identified diverse enteroviruses, demonstrating that using multiple cell lines broadens the diversity of recoverable virus types.
Demonstrates the utility of multi-cell-line environmental surveillance for detecting diverse enteroviruses; leaves.
In 2010, we described sewage contaminated water (SCW) bodies that consistently yielded enteroviruses (EVs) in enterovirus surveillance (ES) sites in Lagos, Nigeria. By 2012, we demonstrated the presence and circulation of Wild Poliovirus 3 (WPV3) in these ES sites. Here we describe ES sites that consistently yield EVs in Ibadan metropolis southwest Nigeria. Twenty-five ES samples were collected by grab method from nine sites between October, 2012 and March, 2013. Samples were concentrated and four (RD, HEp2C, MCF-7 and L20B) different cell lines used for virus isolation from the concentrates. Isolates were subjected to RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, PanEnterovirus 5 l -UTR and VP1 assays. Unidentifiable isolates were further subjected to species-specific RT-PCR assays. Amplicons were sequenced, isolates identified and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Twenty-five isolates were recovered from 8 (32%) of the 25 ES samples collected. Twenty-three of the isolates were identified as EVs by the PanEntero5 l -UTR assay. Thirteen (57%) of the 23 EVs were positive for the VP1 assay, and identified as Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) (1 isolate), CVB6 (1 isolate), E6 (2 isolates), E7 (5 isolates), E11 (1 isolate), E12 (1 isolate) and E13 (2 isolates). None and 2 (25%) of the remaining isolates were positive for the EV-B and EV-C assays, respectively. The 2 EV-C positive enteroviruses were isolated on MCF-7. This study describes three very productive ES sites, and documents the presence of CVB3, CVB6, E6, E7, E11, E12 and, E13 in Ibadan, Nigeria. It shows that including other cell lines in EV isolation protocols can broaden the diversity of EV types recoverable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adeniji et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: