Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To detect and quantitate the causative pathogens in patients with corneal ulcer using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by cycling probe. DESIGN: Clinical and laboratory study of 40 eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with corneal ulcer. Two methods were used for pathogen detection: bacterial culture and real-time PCR with the patient's corneal scrapings. Probes and primers of real-time PCR were designed to be pathogen specific for simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant S aureus, Candida species, and Fusarium species. Results by both methods were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Of 40 eyes, 20 eyes had the same pathogens detected by both methods and those were S aureus (3 eyes; mean [SE], 3.8 [1.3] x 10(1) copies/sample), S pneumoniae (5 eyes; mean [SE], 5.6 [5.1] x 10(3) copies/sample), P aeruginosa (8 eyes; 5.1 [4.0] x 10(3) copies/sample), methicillin-resistant S aureus (1 eye; 1.0 x 10(2) copies/sample), and Candida species (3 eyes; mean [SE], 8.8 [4.9] x 10(3) copies/sample). Six eyes showed negative results by both methods. Results of both methods disagreed in 14 eyes; specifically, 11 had positive PCR results only, 2 had positive culture results only, and 1 eye had positive results for different pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time PCR assay can simultaneously detect and quantitate bacterial and fungal pathogens in patients with corneal ulcer. Real-time PCR can be a fast diagnostic tool and may be useful as an adjunct to identify potential pathogens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motoki Itahashi (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: